To Edward Rutherfurd for his New York: The
Novel, published by Doubleday. This massive, well-written novel
traces the history of New York City, and, through that perspective,
American history generally, from the 17th century to the present.
The history unfolds through the lives and experiences of various
families, free, slave, high class, low class, but primarily through
the Masters, early a mercantile and later a banking family. Although
sometimes the transitions between generations are jerky and the time
shifts very rapid, when either the historical importance or the
drama of the characters increase, the pace slows down appropriately.
The frequent dramatic vignettes of family crises are fascinating.
Even though little lectures of history are sometimes inserted into
dialogue, in the main it reads smoothly and quickly. Readers should
not be daunted by its size. Rutherfurd’s book completely fulfills
the purpose of the prize in making the rich history of America
accessible to the educated general public. – DJL, Sr.
Director’s Historical Fiction Mention:
This is a category for a book or two that, while
not qualifying for the Langum Prize in American Historical Fiction
or even coming close enough so as to qualify for the Honorable
Mention, nevertheless caught the Director’s eye and ought to be
mentioned.
Elizabeth Cobbs Hoffman for In the Lion’s Den:
A Novel of the Civil War, iUniverse, Inc., does not qualify
because self-published. It centers on Charles Adams and his
associates’ diplomatic efforts in London to keep the British from
recognizing the Confederacy and otherwise giving it aid. A parallel
love story is quite predictable and interesting only for its vivid
description of the United States prisoner of war camps. The
treatment of Adams’s diplomacy is essentially fictionalized history
rather than historical fiction. However, it is very well-written and
a pleasure to read, and presents an aspect of the Civil War saga
that is out of the ordinary. – DJL, Sr.
Jamie Ford for Hotel on the Corner of Bitter
and Sweet, Random House, is a heart-warming narrative with
themes of a love story coupled with tangled conflicts and
misunderstandings between fathers and sons, set against the American
government’s eviction of Japanese-Americans from Seattle and their
imprisonment during World War II. The author made some serious
historical errors in the preliminary version, most but not all of
which were corrected in the final book. Additionally, he sometimes
resorts to commonplace images and metaphors. Nonetheless, the
narrative is appealingly straightforward and proceeds with honesty
and great dignity. This is an author who must be encouraged. – DJL,
S
The winner of the 2008 of the David J. Langum, Sr. Prize in American
Historical Fiction is Kathleen Kent for The Heretic’s Daughter:
A Novel, published by Little, Brown.
This vivid novel brings to life the familiar
history of the Salem Witch Trials in a compelling narrative that is
at once authentic, believable, and surprising. Through vivid sensory
imagery and authentic detail, Kent transports the reader to a
seventeenth-century common room or a dank New England jail cell. She
renders the horrific details of the trials and subsequent executions
of ordinary men and women, the mundane details of everyday life, and
the wrenching tale of a family in conflict through a child’s voice
that is rich with the flavor and rhythm of early-American speech,
yet wonderfully accessible. The Heretic’s Daughter is
historical fiction of the highest order: well-researched,
compelling, illuminating, and beautifully done. -- RA
2008 Historical
Fiction Honorable Mention:
Honorable mention is made to Elisabeth Payne Rosen
for Hallam’s War, published by Unbridled Books.
This well-researched and beautifully-written novel
focuses on Hugh Hallam and his family, small plantation owners in
antebellum Tennessee. Hallam is a progressive, in farming methods
and attitudes toward slavery. He treats his slaves with decency and
respect, even offering gradual emancipation. When the War comes,
Hallam fights for his region as a Confederate officer. Yet the title
is ironic, since Hallam fights another war within himself. He is
knowledgeable about the North, and even before the fighting erupts
he knows the South will lose. Hallam ultimately comes to believe
that slavery itself is evil, but even with those conflicts inside
him, he soldiers on. -- DJL, Sr.
Director’s Historical
Fiction Mention:
Another 2008 book published by Unbridled Books
deserves a special mention. Jack Fuller’s Abbeville is a
split time work, in which nearly half of the novel is in the very
near present, and therefore questionable historical fiction. A young
man returns to a fictional tiny, northern Illinois town to try to
discover why his grandfather, who prospered and fell there, lived
such a happy and contented life. I am utterly biased because I grew
up in a small northern Illinois town, larger than Abbeville but
still surrounded by cornfields. So much here rings true. But that is
not why I liked the book. What impressed me is the spiritual theme,
developed but never pushed on the reader. It is written with a deft
touch. -- DJL, Sr.
Langum Prize for Legal History:
The winner of the 2008 David J. Langum, Sr. Prize in American Legal History is
Ernest Freeberg for Democracy’s Prisoner: Eugene V. Debs, the
Great War, and the Right to Dissent, published by the Harvard
University Press.
During American participation in World War I, the Wilson
administration prosecuted and jailed war critics on the specious
ground that their dissent tended to interfere with recruitment of
soldiers. The federal government spied on groups thought to be
critical, harassed individual dissidents, and caused them to lose
their jobs. The government encouraged private vigilance groups to
harass, abduct and even torture American citizens because of their
failure to support Wilson’s ludicrous notion of a war to end all
wars.
As leader of the Socialist Party, Eugene V. Debs became a primary
target of these persecutions, and Freeberg focuses most of this
well-written book on Deb’s specific story, even while relating the
more general history of the repression. Debs became one of the few
imprisoned dissidents whom Wilson refused to release after the war
was completed, and a large-scale campaign clamored for his pardon,
ultimately granted by President Harding. In this campaign, Freeberg
tells us, Debs the specific became the general story, since the
amnesty effort did much to engender the more expansive notions of
free speech that we enjoy today.
This book has important lessons for today, when we are now
concluding another war, in Iraq, that many people and groups
opposed. Again the federal government spied on Americans and
practiced torture. Before surrendering to utter discouragement, we
might reflect on either the refusal or inability of President Bush
to simply imprison those who strongly criticized his war, as
predecessor Wilson had done. The sacrifices of Debs and the
dissidents of that generation may have worked a permanent change in
the rights of dissent and free speech during wartime. For that, and
this fine account, we should be thankful. – DJL, Sr.
2008 Legal History Honorable Mention:
Honorable mention is made to Peter Charles Hoffer for the book,
The Treason Trials of Aaron Burr, published by the University
Press of Kansas.
This fine work vividly portrays Aaron Burr’s strange intrigues in
the West and provides an illuminating account of the political and
legal aspects of trials that helped to establish the principle that
courts will not permit the President or Congress to manipulate the
law of treason for the purpose of stifling dissent. Hoffer also
demonstrates how the trials made fundamental contributions to the
law of evidence and criminal procedure.
Hoffer provides fresh insights into the interactions among Burr,
Thomas Jefferson, and John Marshall, and his book is an important
addition to the on-going re-evaluation of Burr’s reputation. -- WGR
The David J. Langum, Sr. Prize in American Historical Fiction for
2007 is awarded to Kurt Andersen for his Heyday, a novel (New
York: Random House, 2007). Andersen’s Heyday well-fits the
purposes of the prize. Set in 1848, the novel begins in New York
City and explores the relationship of a traveling Englishman and an
American actress and clandestine prostitute, their friends and
relations. As misunderstandings develop between the principal
protagonists, the woman flees westward, the man pursues her, and in
a sub-plot a would-be assassin chases the man. They all end up in
California at the beginning of the Gold Rush.
In this engaging novel, Andersen immerses the reader in rich
quotidian details of life in New York City and California. The chase
across the entire continent allows Andersen to portray the middle of
the country, its history and prospects as of 1848, an area often
neglected by historical fiction. The Midwestern utopian communities
of the mid-nineteenth century are particularly well-described.
Meditations on American inventiveness run throughout the book.
The reader acquires much social history from this 1848 setting.
Where appropriate to the plot, the characters ruminate about
political events or are in contact with actual actors on the
political, economic, or cultural stage, thereby giving the reader
political and economic history, especially relating to technology,
in the context of the mid-nineteenth century.
In short, Heyday, a novel is both excellent fiction and
lavishly excellent history. - DJL, Sr.
Langum Prize for Legal History:
The David J. Langum, Sr. Prize in American Legal History or
Biography for 2007 is awarded to Bruce J. Dierenfield for his book
The Battle over School Prayer: How Engel v. Vitale Changed
America (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2007). A major
issue roiling the American public since the 1960s has been the
appropriateness and constitutionality of organized prayers in the
American public schools. In Engel v. Vitale [1962] the United
States Supreme Court struck down a bland prayer without explicit
Christian reference that New York State law permitted and a local
school district required students recite as a part of the daily
opening exercises. In Engel, its first entry into the school
prayer issue, the Court held that even with opt-out provisions that
permitted individual students to remain silent or leave the room,
the prayer violated the interpretation of the First Amendment that
had created a “wall of separation” between church and state. The
decision caused great consternation. Adherents of public prayers
bemoaned their withdrawal in schools as fostering juvenile
delinquency, even communism, and destroying the traditional
understanding and privileged place of the Christian religion in the
nation. Some with such views denounced the ACLU, atheists, Jews, and
others they thought were fomenting trouble by bringing lawsuits
based on the First Amendment to challenge prayer in schools.
Dierenfield has done a wonderful job of lucidly describing this
controversy and the resulting litigation. Although the heart of the
book is the Engel case, he also traces the entire history of
the American church and state relationship, with particular
reference to religious activity in schools, including Bible reading,
student-led prayer, moments of silence, student pre and post-school
religious activities within the school grounds, as well as organized
prayers and Constitutional amendments designed to restore them.
The book is calm in tone and presents all sides to the
controversies. Dierenfield conducted numerous interviews with the
Engel parties, lawyers, judge, students, teachers, and school
officials, as well as the participants of other court battles over
school prayer. As a result of these interviews he is able to
describe the impact of the litigation on the individuals directly
involved. These were generally vicious taunts and reprisals heaped
on the plaintiffs and their families by the advocates of public
Christian prayer.
As is true with all of the other books in the Kansas series,
Landmark Law Cases and American Society, Dierenfield’s Battle
over School Prayer, is not footnoted. However, the thorough
scholarship is clearly evident, and the book has an excellent
bibliographic essay and a good, useable index. – DJL, Sr.
The David J. Langum, Sr. Prize in American Historical Fiction is
awarded to Sheldon Russell for his Dreams to Dust: A Tale of the
Oklahoma Land Rush (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2006).
In this exciting book, Sheldon Russell vividly portrays the Oklahoma
land rush of 1889, with special attention to the brief and intense
boom-to-bust town of Guthrie. To some extent a roman a clef, many of
the novel’s characters are patterned after actual persons and events
in early Oklahoma. The treatment of these characters in Russell’s
hands is what makes the book rise above the average fast-paced
novel. The inner character of the protagonist and many of the
primary figures are touched by the spirit of greed and acquisition
accompanying the land rush and they engage in conduct with
questionable ethical standards. The book is a good correction to the
generality of work about great booms, in that it shows their less
attractive consequences as well as their glitter. - DJL, Sr.
Langum Prize for Legal History:
The David J. Langum, Sr. Prize in American Legal History or
Biography goes to Saul Cornell for his A Well-Regulated Militia:
The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America
(New York: Oxford University Press, 2006). Cornell argues that the
Founding Fathers’ intention for the Second Amendment was to permit
Americans to fulfill their civic obligation to assemble for the
militia, in contrast with standard modern interpretations, that the
Second Amendment gives rights to individuals to bear arms or,
alternatively, that it gives only collective rights to the states.
While reasonable minds might differ as to this constitutional
reading, the primary value of this book is not its view of the
Constitution, but rather its history of how Americans over time,
from the early republic to the present, have done this reading.
Somewhat of an intellectual history as well as a legal history,
Cornell shows us how interpretations of the Second Amendment and
views of the role of the militia have varied over time and among
different sets of Americans. There has been much serious scholarly
study of the interpretation of the Second Amendment, with less
concerned with its history over the lifetime of the country.
However, almost none of either category is directed toward the
educated general public. Saul Cornell’s book well fills a need in an
area of great public interest. - DJL, Sr.
2006 Honorable Mention:
Honorary mention is given to Carolyn N. Long for her Mapp v.
Ohio: Guarding against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
(Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2006).
For American historical fiction: Madison House: A Novel by
Peter Donahue (Hawthorne Books, 2005).
One reviewer has written that Peter Donahue seems to have a map of
turn-of-the-century Seattle in his head. Indeed, his vivid detail,
not only of geography but also the means and implements of living,
gives this novel great verisimilitude as an historical work. The two
principal figures and their unusual love affair, together with the
vivid characters who surround them, play out against the dramatic
transformation of Seattle from frontier settlement to booming
metropolis. Beyond the fascinating characters and strong story line,
the work is also a meditation on the human cost of expansion and
enterprise, insisting that pain and suffering to individual human
beings
can accompany conventional progress. - DJL, Sr.
Langum Prize for Legal History:
For American legal history and legal biography: To the Flag: The
Unlikely History of the Pledge of Allegiance by Richard J. Ellis
(University Press of Kansas, 2005).
To the Flag is a lively and engaging book that traces the
origins of the Pledge of Allegiance to the American flag and
provides a fascinating history of the legal and cultural
controversies that this simple thirty-one word ritual has generated
for more than a century. Professor Ellis demonstrates how the Pledge
has reflected deep anxieties about national unity, tensions between
materialism and spirituality, and fears about excessive
individualism and political radicalism. This meticulously researched
book brings fresh insights into the Supreme Court's decisions
concerning conscientious objection to the recitation ritual and
recent legal challenges to the inclusion of the words "under God" in
the Pledge. It also illuminates many largely forgotten episodes
involving public and private efforts to stimulate various versions
of patriotism. Although Ellis demonstrates that the Pledge's
succinct expression of the nation's aspirations has fostered
national unity, he explains that the Pledge "also has been used to
coerce and intimidate, to compel conformity, and to silence
dissent." Ellis raises timely questions about the meaning of
Americanism in an increasingly pluralistic society. - WGR
2005 Honorable Mention:
Griswold v. Connecticut: Birth Control and the Constitutional
Right of Privacy, by John W. Johnson (Kansas University Press,
2005).
Linda Busby Parker for her Seven Laurels: A Novel (Southeast
Missouri State University Press, 2004).
Linda Parker’s book well meets the prize requirements of “both
excellent fiction and excellent history.” Set in a small town in
South Alabama, Seven Laurels traces the struggles from the
1950s through the early 1990s of an artisan, a black man named
Brewster McAtee, to advance in life and enter the American
mainstream. There are any number of excellent books on the coming of
integration in the southern cities, but Seven Laurels
provides relatively uncommon insights into the fading of segregation
in the rural South. The descriptions are vivid and the characters
sharply drawn. Not far into the book the reader begins to really
care about McAtee and his family, and is drawn compulsively into
their story. The McAtees’ progress is hardly linear; there are steep
downs as well as ups. Seven Laurels is at times heart
warming, at other times heart wrenching, but is always filled with
marvelous writing. - DJL, Sr.
2004 Honorable Mention:
Sanora Babb, for Whose Names Are Unknown: A Novel (University
of Oklahoma Press, 2004)
Langum Prize for Legal History:
John M. Ferren for his Salt of the Earth, Conscience of the
Court: The Story of Justice Wiley Rutledge (University of North
Carolina Press, 2004).
Many readers regard judicial biography as a suspect category. Often
written in a ponderous academic style, judicial biographies also
tend to concentrate excessively on judicial opinions and chamber
procedures, largely because judges generally lead quiet personal
lives off the bench. However, John Ferren’s biography of Supreme
Court Justice Wiley Rutledge is of a different order. This is a
truly satisfying biography, not mere arcane discussion, and by the
end of the book the reader feels that he truly understands Rutledge,
both the man and his work. Ferren gives us a richly textured
description and nuanced evaluation of Rutledge’s entire life, his
personal life and career as a legal academic, as well as his
judicial years.
The richness of the available manuscript materials, especially
the Rutledge Papers in the Library of Congress, facilitated this.
However, Ferren added extensively to the existing archival wealth by
conducting personal interviews with Rutledge’s former students, law
clerks, family, and friends. The bibliography lists 115 oral
interviews, plus an additional 52 comments by letter. Of course, in
reading of Rutledge’s life the reader does become informed of
Supreme Court politics, procedures, and opinions. However, the
educated general reader will be borne along through these seemingly
arcane matters by Ferren’s wonderfully lucid and accessible writing.
- DJL, Sr.
2004 Honorable Mention:
Fries's Rebellion: The Enduring Struggle for the American
Revolution by Paul Douglas Newman (University of Pennsylvania
Press, 2004).
Robert J. Begiebing for his Rebecca Wentworth’s Distraction:
A Novel (University Press of New England, 2003).
Rebecca Wentworth’s Distraction’s protagonist is a young male
artist, supporting himself in colonial Portsmouth, New Hampshire by
painting portraits of wealthy families. On one level the book is an
account of the love affair between himself and a young woman of the
upper class, herself a far more profound artist than her lover. On
yet another level, it teaches us about the American art world of the
eighteenth century. At a much deeper level, and by indirection, the
novel informs the reader of the nature of class in colonial America,
and of the limitations of freedom of action experienced by women,
even women of the upper class. At the end of the book, a “reading
guide” offers some very thoughtful questions for discussion and an
interview with the author that sets forth explicitly his historical
research and his use of historical material alongside the fictional.
The book is engaging and readable. - DJL, Sr.
Langum Prize for Legal History:
Robert J. Cottrol, Raymond T. Diamond, and Leland B. Ware for their
Brown v. Board of Education: Caste, Culture, and the Constitution
(University Press of Kansas, 2003).
It needs no explanation that the critical school desegregation
case of Brown v. Board of Education is among the most important
decisions of the United States Supreme Court in the twentieth
century. However, this book describes far more than just the lawsuit
of its title. In addition to a thorough coverage of Brown, this work
traces a panoramic background of the discriminatory treatment of
blacks from the mid-nineteenth century to the famous lawsuit and
beyond. It does this looking through the prism of law and culture,
but with a discussion of legal decisions and principles that is
clear and could hardly be more lucidly written. Particularly
skillful is the authors’ description of the synergetic relationship
of general American cultural attitudes towards blacks and their
treatment in law. Which is to say that cultural change is an
important element in legal change. Particularly courageous is the
asking of some hard questions at the end of the book about Brown’s
legacy. Although not central to the theme of the book, the authors
do raise the serious issues posed by the re-segregation of most
urban schools through a combination of economics and white flight,
and also the rejection of many inner-city black youths of hard work
at school as “acting white” and thereby a rejection of their own
racial identity. - DJL, Sr.
No award for historical fiction was made for 2002.
Langum Prize for Legal History:
Two books each won the 2002 prize.
Stuart Banner for his The Death Penalty: An American History
(Harvard University Press, 2002).
Stuart Banner has succeed in writing a book I would have thought
impossible: a scrupulously dispassionate history of executions in
America, from the early colonial period right through the June 2002
execution of Timothy McVeigh. Far more than a mere chronicle of
politics and law, Banner details the changing cultural, religious,
and even technological contexts of the death penalty. Neutrality of
presentation does not preclude critique or analysis, and Banner is
quick to criticize specious arguments on both sides of the death
penalty debate. Written in an engaging manner, it is a fair
prediction that this masterful and thorough study will challenge the
views of all readers, no matter what their prior positions. - DJL,
Sr.
Lawrence M. Friedman for his American Law in the 20th Century
(Yale University Press, 2002).
Lawrence M. Friedman in many books has proved himself to be the
master of direct exposition combined with vivid verbs and nicely
turned phrases. In several of his works he has also demonstrated
remarkable skills in synthesizing massive amounts of materials into
single volume treatments of extremely broad topics. He has combined
his literary skills and ability at synthesis in this masterful
study. Friedman approaches law as an integral part of American
society, not as a kingdom unto itself, and finds that changes in the
economic and social history of America are most responsible for
changes in the law. His major themes are the rise of the
welfare-regulatory state, the shift of power and authority to the
national government, and the explosion in the size and scale of the
legal system. He explores those themes through the examination of
topics such as the Roosevelt revolution, race relations and civil
rights, and the liability explosion. This book offers the educated
general reader delightfully readable access to the broad history of
American law in the twentieth century, or such smaller slices as may
be desired. -DJL, Sr.
No award for historical fiction was made for 2001.
Langum Prize for Legal History:
Elizabeth Urban Alexander for her Notorious Woman: The Celebrated
Case of Myra Clark Gaines (Louisiana State University Press,
2001).
Elizabeth Urban Alexander has succeeded in imposing order on a
truly massive amount of materials that document more than fifty
years of litigation over Myra Gaines’s New Orleans inheritance. The
difficulty of creating a short, coherent account out of such a mass
of court records, correspondence, and newspaper accounts is
enormous; her research and scholarship is impressive.
Not only has Professor Alexander made sense out of this Louisiana
version of Bleak House, she has also created a well-written, direct,
and fascinating narrative. What really sets the book apart are the
numerous succinct and deftly-crafted historical summaries. Through
these, the reader learns about a variety of topics, such as: women’s
changing roles in the nineteenth century in the legal system, on the
public platform, and in sentimental fiction; and the rich political,
social, and economic history of New Orleans. Never didactic in tone,
the author skillfully seduces the reader into these vignettes of
descriptive and analytical history through excellent writing and
their real relationship with the strong narrative story of the
litigation. - DJL, Sr.